Hello! I have the goal of using the Blackbox to multisample instruments and patches I come across in the real world, to keep the 'vibe' of that instrument with me forevermore. Think of this as akin to field recording in spirit. Currently I'm only sampling instruments that have a line out/headphones port, but in the future I would like to work with microphones to sample other non-electronic instruments and sound makers as well.
So the scenario is that I'm creating multisamples from an instrument that I don't own, and in most cases that instrument doesn't support MIDI or CV, so I can't use the 'multisample robot' feature. Everything has to be done by hand, and as quickly as possible. To keep it simple, let's say I'm sampling an instrument with a traditional piano keyboard, such as an old Casiotone or something, so I at least know what notes I'm playing. Specifically I'm trying to sample the Casio CTK-330 right now, a dusty old keyboard I found in a closet, so we'll use that as an example. What I'm currently doing is:
1) Create a new preset with the name of the instrument, e.g. 'Casio CTK-330'
2) Choose whether I should sample in stereo or mono. In most cases, mono is sufficient. I just use the Blackbox's VU meter to see if there's any difference in the L / R channels, and if there isn't, then I sample mono from L channel only.
3) Sample a range of notes such as C2, G2, C3, G3, C4, G4, etc. Generally I would just sample the range of the instrument's keyboard, whatever it may be.
4) I name each sample descriptively with the note name and name of patch, such as "C2 Piano 1.wav", "G2 Piano 1.wav", etc.
5) Go into each sample individually and set the root note to match the note name, such as C2. Make sure to save and overwrite each WAV file and not just the preset. As shown in the tutorial video.
6) Go to an empty pad and 'Load All', then play the multisample across the keyboard. Listen and determine that it sounds like crap
What I'm generally finding is that even though I have assigned the 'root note' value for each sample individually, the Blackbox is still loading the files alphabetically when choosing 'Load All', and so some will be out of order, and other files will be stretched across multiple octaves and therefore not sound very good. It doesn't seem to be mapping to the root note metadata, which makes me suspect that I'm not writing the metadata properly. However, I don't know how to check and verify this.
I've read the manual several times, gone through every thread on these forums that are returned up with the keyword search 'multisample', and I've watched the official tutorial here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RERHQPz2rpc
I'm on firmware 2.1.0, haven't tried the new beta firmware yet.
I've also analyzed the SympleSound multisamples provided by 1010, and the only difference I can see is that the file names are using MIDI note numbers instead of note names. However, my understanding from the manual and various tutorials is that once the root note is saved in the WAV file metadata itself, the file name ceases to matter, and the files will be mapped out according to the note name in metadata. So I don't think that going through the trouble of adding the MIDI note value to each file name would make any difference, but I'm happy to be corrected there.
I also noticed that the SympleSound examples are sampled at irregular intervals, alternating 3 and 4 semitone apart. I don't know why, but perhaps that would help me? Maybe I should memorize a specific order of notes to sample instead of a simple C2, G2, C3, G3 etc pattern? I understand that more samples means a higher quality result, but also sampling every single note seems too tedious for the workflow I'm after.
Thanks everyone, and happy holidays!
So the scenario is that I'm creating multisamples from an instrument that I don't own, and in most cases that instrument doesn't support MIDI or CV, so I can't use the 'multisample robot' feature. Everything has to be done by hand, and as quickly as possible. To keep it simple, let's say I'm sampling an instrument with a traditional piano keyboard, such as an old Casiotone or something, so I at least know what notes I'm playing. Specifically I'm trying to sample the Casio CTK-330 right now, a dusty old keyboard I found in a closet, so we'll use that as an example. What I'm currently doing is:
1) Create a new preset with the name of the instrument, e.g. 'Casio CTK-330'
2) Choose whether I should sample in stereo or mono. In most cases, mono is sufficient. I just use the Blackbox's VU meter to see if there's any difference in the L / R channels, and if there isn't, then I sample mono from L channel only.
3) Sample a range of notes such as C2, G2, C3, G3, C4, G4, etc. Generally I would just sample the range of the instrument's keyboard, whatever it may be.
4) I name each sample descriptively with the note name and name of patch, such as "C2 Piano 1.wav", "G2 Piano 1.wav", etc.
5) Go into each sample individually and set the root note to match the note name, such as C2. Make sure to save and overwrite each WAV file and not just the preset. As shown in the tutorial video.
6) Go to an empty pad and 'Load All', then play the multisample across the keyboard. Listen and determine that it sounds like crap

What I'm generally finding is that even though I have assigned the 'root note' value for each sample individually, the Blackbox is still loading the files alphabetically when choosing 'Load All', and so some will be out of order, and other files will be stretched across multiple octaves and therefore not sound very good. It doesn't seem to be mapping to the root note metadata, which makes me suspect that I'm not writing the metadata properly. However, I don't know how to check and verify this.
I've read the manual several times, gone through every thread on these forums that are returned up with the keyword search 'multisample', and I've watched the official tutorial here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RERHQPz2rpc
I'm on firmware 2.1.0, haven't tried the new beta firmware yet.
I've also analyzed the SympleSound multisamples provided by 1010, and the only difference I can see is that the file names are using MIDI note numbers instead of note names. However, my understanding from the manual and various tutorials is that once the root note is saved in the WAV file metadata itself, the file name ceases to matter, and the files will be mapped out according to the note name in metadata. So I don't think that going through the trouble of adding the MIDI note value to each file name would make any difference, but I'm happy to be corrected there.
I also noticed that the SympleSound examples are sampled at irregular intervals, alternating 3 and 4 semitone apart. I don't know why, but perhaps that would help me? Maybe I should memorize a specific order of notes to sample instead of a simple C2, G2, C3, G3 etc pattern? I understand that more samples means a higher quality result, but also sampling every single note seems too tedious for the workflow I'm after.
Thanks everyone, and happy holidays!
Comment