ADSR Envelope as modulation source (maybe second envelope)

[denizgarout]

Hi, I’m loving the new update with LFOs in 1.9.F
The only thing missing for me to make this a simple synth engine is to have the ADSR envelope as a modulation source. Also would be great to have a second ADSR envelope per pad. So I could go to the filter and select Envelope 1 (the gate envelope) or envelope 2 as a modulation source.
this would open up the possibilities of sound shaping even more and you basically have a synth in front of you when you use a raw saw wave as a sample.

[Pianoman]

+1 !
Although I could imagine this would require too much CPU power.

An alternative could be to have the option to set the LFO in a Single Cycle mode.
In that way you could create a simple decay by using the ramp down LFO wave.

[denizgarout]

True. but I also thought LFOs and even just more polyphony would be too much for the CPU but the 1010 team keeps proving me wrong with their updates I believe in u!

[sagetone]

+1 on this!

Def enable the ADSR to be a modulation source. For the second ADSR, or LFO, how about instead adding a cycling envelope. Per pad, an ADSR, LFO, and cycling env all modulation sources.

[jayneural]

I believe a 2nd envelope we could assign to the filter would make so much sense.

but then for sure I will ask for oscillator source type of pad because it’s probably the only thing still missing for a wavetable synth !

[Xenflex]

+1 for this. 3 independent ADSR envelopes assignable to multiple parameters would be amazing.